Home
entries friends calendar user info KOOP Radio Previous Previous

Advertisement

Issues for Your Tissues
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
On Issues for Your Tissues October 28th show I spoke to Ted Miller from NARAL Pro-Choice America about the healthcare bill making its way through the Senate right now.

Tags: , , , , ,
Current Mood: busy

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Today on Issues for Your Tissues, I took a look at the Stupak Pitts amendment to the House healthcare bill and compared it language in the Hyde amendment. Sometimes in comparisons, one thing looks better than the other, even though it's a piece of crap as well.


You can read the text of the amendment for yourself.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Current Mood: aggravated

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend

Planned Parenthood Client Speaks Amid Questions Over Director's "Change Of Heart"

 

A reader who received abortion counseling from Planned-Parenthood-director-turned-anti-abortion-activist Abby Johnson (pictured) emailed to tell us Johnson was very familiar with abortion ultrasounds long before one supposedly caused her "conversion." Her email, and more questions about Johnson's story, after the jump.

The reader, who asked that we keep her anonymous, wrote (link ours):

I read your story and I live in College Station. I had an abortion at the Bryan Planned Parenthood location in July and she was my "counselor"....meaning she took me in the little office, I told her I was pregnant and wanted an abortion and she helped me pick which method (the pill...I was about 4.5 weeks) and schedule my appointment. This PP only does abortions on Saturdays with a doctor that comes in from Houston. She was there both the Saturday I was given the pill and the next Saturday when I had to come in for my follow-up ultrasound, so I'm not exactly sure how she could have thought an abortion meant you were going to shit rainbows. I can honestly say I am completely shocked. I was 21 and an atheist, and I didn't have any moral conflict about what I was going to do and I told her that. She was very understanding and matter-of-fact. I even started to cry (mostly because I was worried about what my boyfriend would say) and she comforted me. Her office was covered in pro-choice bumper stickers and buttons, and she didn't push the issue when she asked if I wanted to know about alternative choices. I also saw year about two years ago for birth control, so she has at least been there that long.

The most striking part of the e-mail is its mention of ultrasound — Johnson said she changed her position on pregnancy termination after seeing such an ultrasound, but our tipster isn't the only one to point out that this sounds a little implausible. Writing at Double X, Pandagon's Amanda Marcotte says,

Johnson's story fits way too neatly into a bunch of easily disproven anti-choice myths, the main one being that all it takes is one glance at an ultrasound to cause someone to "realize" that hey! abortion removes a fetus from your uterus. [...] After all, your average person in the United States has seen probably hundreds of sonograms in their lives, and most of them show a fetus at gestational age well beyond the point that most women get elective abortions. If you compare the ultrasound taken prior to an elective abortion, the feeling is actually one of being underwhelmed, because there's not much there compared to the ones we're used to seeing. The anti-choice sentimental devices rely therefore on ignorance more than illumination-their own mistaken understanding of what goes on in an abortion clinic.

While the story Johnson is now telling does seem like a well-crafted anti-abortion fable, it doesn't ultimately matter so much what caused Johnson to change her mind about reproductive rights (though it is worthwhile to note, as Broadsheet's Lynn Harris does, that many women change their minds in the other direction every day). What does matter is whether she's now slandering Planned Parenthood. Marcotte thinks she may be. She writes, "Johnson's accusation-that her branch was trying to discourage contraception to up the number of abortions-fits into a long-standing, demonstrably false anti-choice myth about Planned Parenthood, which is that they are a profit-making business that makes most of its money off abortion." This accusation was the most disturbing thing about Johnson's story, and some speculated that Planned Parenthood's restraining order against Johnson was a desperate attempt to keep such mercenary practices under wraps. But as Marcotte points out, Broadsheet's Tracy Clark-Flory looked at the restraining order, and found that it was issued pretty much for exactly the reasons we guessed: namely, a doctor was at risk.

According to Clark-Flory, the order accuses Johnson of copying confidential files after Planned Parenthood initiated a performance review of her, and of passing personal information — including home address — about an abortion provider to the anti-choice group Coalition for Life. It doesn't sound like Planned Parenthood is trying to silence a turncoat with inside information about its evil schemes. Instead, the organization appears to be protecting its employees from the threat of harassment — or, in the wake of abortion provider George Tiller's murder, worse.

Questions about the ultrasound story aside (Clark-Flory, too, wonders "How many pamphlets and protest signs displaying extremely graphic images (far more so than an ultrasound) must have been shoved in her face over the years?"), the reasons for Johnson's decision to leave Planned Parenthood aren't for us to judge. But as her public profile rises — Clark-Flory writes that she's soon to appear on The O'Reilly Factor — many people will take her for an authority on the inner workings of Planned Parenthood. If Johnson really is guilty of both misrepresenting Planned Parenthood's tactics and leaking confidential information (she denies the latter), then she not only doesn't deserve to speak for her former organization, but she's not a valid advocate for the anti-abortion position. Principled anti-abortion advocates should be just as skeptical as pro-choicers are of Johnson's story — if they stand for morality, they shouldn't want a liar on their side.

Former Planned Parenthood Director Telling Fishy Story [Double X]
The Conversion Of A Pro-Choice Warrior [Broadsheet]
"I Used To Call Myself Pro-Life" [Broadsheet]


Send an email to Anna North, the author of this post, at annanorth@jezebel.com.

Tags: , , ,
Current Mood: amused

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Today on Issues for Your Tissues I discussed Abby Johnson, former Planned Parenthood of Bryan's director, specifically her change of heart and personal "spiritual conversation" with herself as well as her current efforts to support policies that actually increase the number of unintended pregnancies and elective abortions.




Tags: , , ,
Current Mood: frustrated

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend

Planned Parenthood Director's Holes in Story Revealed In Recent Radio Interview

Last week, Abby Johnson, the director of a Texas Planned Parenthood health center that provides abortions, among its other services including birth control, annual exams and sexually transmitted infection prevention and treatment, resigned citing a "conversion" that caused her to see abortion in an entirely new light. Her resignation came just weeks after the 40 Days for Life anti-choice campaign wrapped up its annual protest in front of the clinic.

Television and online news outlets are reporting that her change of heart was the result of viewing an ultrasound. From Fox News, Johnson is reported as saying:

“When I was working at Planned Parenthood I was extremely pro-choice,” Johnson told FoxNews.com. But after seeing the internal workings of the procedure for the first time on an ultrasound monitor [editor's note: emphasis mine], “I would say there was a definite conversion in my heart … a spiritual conversion.”

From a television interview on a local Texas station:

One of the most basic questions I have is this: How did Ms. Johnson become the director of a Planned Parenthood center that provides abortions up to 14 weeks - that is technically a second trimester abortion - without having seen an ultrasound image of a fetus in utero or an actual abortion being performed? When a woman comes into a health center and takes a pregnancy test to confirm pregnancy and then requests an abortion, providers need to give her an ultrasound to ensure that the pregnancy isn't ectopic and to figure out how far along in the pregnancy the woman is, among other things. Ultrasounds, at the health center I worked at for seven years, were a routine part of care. Marcy Bloom, former executive director at Aradia Womens' Health Center (the clinic at which I worked), says, "Pre-abortion ultrasound is the standard of care in the United States."

Some women wanted to see the ultrasound image and some didn't. It almost never swayed them, of course, because (shock!), the women knew there was a fetus growing inside them and didn't need an image on a screen to make them aware. But, also, because 61% of women who get abortions are already mothers - mothers who generally receive ultrasounds during pregnancy - they are aware of what an ultrasound will reveal. 
 
All employees at the feminist women's health center I worked in - from the communications and outreach staff to the women who performed client intake - were offered the chance to view an abortion as a means of understanding how abortion is performed and how best to assist women undergoing the procedure. This was all done with the consent of the client, of course. Now, as with any surgical procedure, there were certainly employees who did not work directly with clients for whom viewing an abortion was the last thing in the world they wanted to see. And that makes sense. Of course, this was a feminist health center and we did do things differently. However it is still hard to understand how Ms. Johnson didn't know what an actual abortion entailed.
 
The 40 Days for Life campaign started in Bryan/College Station, TX - the campaign that seemed to spur Ms. Johnson's conversion. The 40 Days for Life campaign web site puts it this way:

Abby Johnson worked at Planned Parenthood in Bryan, Texas for eight years. She was there when the first-ever 40 Days for Life campaign was conducted outside of her workplace in the Bryan/College Station community in 2004.

She was there for the next 40 Days for Life effort as well — the one that helped to launch the first nationally coordinated 40 Days for Life campaign in the fall of 2007.

And she was there for the one after that, and the one after that, and the one after that — and the one after that!

40 Days for Life is run by a man named Shawn Carney who also runs the local Coalition for Life which, yep, Ms. Johnson has now aligned herself (her television interview is done with Mr. Carney by her side). In fact, the 40 Days for Life folks are so thrilled by Ms. Johson's "sudden spiritual conversion" that the blogger on the site practically explodes with this news,

"I’ve known about this for the past few weeks, but now I can finally share the HUGE NEWS!"

This might yet raise another eyebrow (if I had more than two). It seems Ms. Johnson's conversion wasn't so sudden, huh? I'd love to know how these events went down. Ms. Johnson sees an abortion on an ultrasound for the first time, goes home and realizes - oh my god, I've worked at an abortion clinic for years, I've advocated strongly for reproductive rights, supported women's health issues - but now I need to call the leader of 40 Days for Life to tell them about this? And have them keep it secret for weeks?

Why? Why have the leader of 40 Days for Life keep this secret for weeks before the great reveal? 

Though I cannot answer that, the restraining order Planned Parenthood of Texas has issued against Abby Johnson and Coalition for Life may makes more sense now.

From a statement released on Friday, Octobert 30th from Planned Parenthood of Southeast Houston and Texas officials:

“Today, through our attorneys, we requested and Judge X of the District Court of Brazos County issued a Temporary Restraining Order against the Brazos Valley Coalition for Life and former employee Abby Brannam Johnson.  We regret being forced to turn to the courts to protect the safety and confidentiality of our clients and staff, however, in this instance it is absolutely necessary.”

At the time of the writing of this post, Planned Parenthood has not released any further information about why the restraining order is needed but, according to Planned Parenthood officials in Texas, they are working on a statement currently.

What might be the most shocking juxtaposition, however, is this interview [1] aired on September 20, 2009, just weeks ago on KEOS, a small college radio station. 

During the interview, Ms. Johnson not only makes clear that her Planned Parenthood center's abortion services make up only 3% of their services, which, according to Diane Quest, National Media Director for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, is about on par with the national numbers - "Planned Parenthood’s focus is on prevention. Nationwide, more than 90% of the health care Planned Parenthood affiliates provide is preventive in nature, including wellness exams, breast and cervical cancer screenings, contraception, and STD testing and treatment." She also says that the "entirely separate" 501(c)3 (nonprofit) corporation that funds their abortion services received a $30 million grant from a private anonymous donor recently to keep their abortion services running.

From the interview:

Interviewer: What percentage of your services are abortion?

Johnson: About 3%.

Interviewer: So, it's not really much.

Johnson: No.

Interviewer: So when people label you an abortion facility are they being truthful when they are saying that?

Johnson: Well not unless you think 3% is an overwhelming amount I guess, but no, we don't think so. We think 3% is a very small amount and our - I guess our goal has always been that every pregnancy is intended and wanted and um, when we see a dip in abortion numbers we consider that a success. 

When the interviewer asks her specifically about funding for PP's programs, here's what Abby Johnson says,

PP is a Medicaid provider. First off, PP is divided up into separate corporations. So, there is a Planned Parenthood 501c3 non profit that is a family planning corporation. Also, there is a PP surgical services corporation that is our abortion and vasectomy services. They are totally separate corporations. The surgical services corporation, regardless of what you might hear, receives no government funding - all private donations. And then almost two years ago we received about 30 million dollars in an anonymous donation from a foundation to help women receive abortion services where money was a barrier.

 

That sort of runs rough shod over her allegations that some unnamed source encouraged her to increase abortions for financial reasons, doesn't it?

But what's more fascinating is the myriad ways (and keep in mind this interview was done, seemingly, around the same exact time in which she has apparently had a conversion and is keeping it a secret from all except 40 Days for Life) in which she passionately discusses her deeply held belief that women need access to abortion services for their well-being and health:

Interviewer: Why did you become involved in reproductive health care?

Johson: It's important to me because i think it's a human rights issue. I had talked with some physicians who performed abortions pre Roe v. Wade and listened to them talk about their horror stories of women who had to have illegal abortions and the way they would perform them and how they would have to watch women die from illegal procedures and that really hit home for me as a woman and as a mother. I don't ever want to go back to the days where women have to take their own lives in their hands because of an unintended or unwanted pregnancy.  So, it was very personal for me.

Where did Ms. Johnson's concerns for women's health and lives, her plea for things never to "go back to the days where women have to take their own lives in their hands because of an unintended...pregnancy" go? Where do these fears live now, Ms. Johnson? 

Perhaps the most damning and confusing parts of the interview, however, are related to the lengthy conversation about 40 Days for Life, Coalition for Life, their protests and anti-choice violence as of late.

When the interviewer asks her about all of the protests that her center has had to endure as well as the overall effect of anti-choice campaigning against them including a claim by Coalition for Life that her PP had failed a health inspection, Ms. Johnson responds by calling the Coalition for Life liars, essentially, and denigrates them, 

The Coalition (for Life) made claims that we didn't sterilize instruments - that was absolutely not true. The only thing that had anything to do with patient care - right now we're  on electronic records but back in 2006 we still had chars. The Texas Dept of Health wanted to take a significant number of charts outside the clinic and we didn't allow it and they wrote us up as a deficiency. They said because they are the state they can take out whatever reecords they want and we argued that we promise our patients we won't allow their records to be reomved and we stuck to that. We got written up for protecting patient confidentiality. And when the Coalition found that report they thought they had hit a gold mine but they took what was on there, misconstrued it and made it look like we had failed it. 

 

And when the interviewer specifically asks about the protests 40 Days for Life organizes (you know the one that just occurred immediately before Ms. Johnson experienced her "spiritual conversion"), Ms. Johnson makes no bones about her frustration:

It is a protest where they stand doutside of our facility for 12 hours a day, during business hours. We call it 40 days of harrassment. They stand outside and harrass our patients. 

Ms. Johnson goes onto explain how the coalition offers inaccurate information and harrasses women who are coming in for pap smears, breast exams or birth control and try to convince them to go to providers who are either extremely expensive or don't provide the services these women are seeking.

Johnson: So its confusing to our patients and we actually have had some patients that have talked to members of the Coaliton protesting and have been convinced and every single time they come back to us. So, the information they are giving in inaccurate. 

 

Perhaps what is most disturbing about Ms. Johnson's claims that she is now "pure of heart" is her decision to sweep the violence and harrassment she and her own family - including her daughter and her husband - as well as her former employees have been experiencing at the hands of the very same folks she is now choosing to align herself with in the name of religion and purity:

Interviewer: Have you ever been targeted? I've seen how aggressive these protestors can be - 

Johnson: Sure. Back about a year and a half ago, I was receiving death threats that were targeted at me and my husband and my daugher. The rest of the staff - they received harrassing things in the mail. Things that will go to them and the rest of the neighborhood announcing that they are an abortioninst. And all these gruesome things that they do not participate in. Things they put out there for shock value. And send out to neightborhood. They - some of our staff members have had pickets at their homes. You wake up in morning, have coffee and there are people protesting outside at their home. Some of us have been followed different places in oru cars. We go to the mall and we notice there are people following us. It's very serious. This group of peope that claim to be "peaceful prayer warriors" or whatever they call themselves. It's kind of ironic that some of them would be sending death threats adn that they would be harrassing and stalking some of our staff. 

Somehow in the span of a few weeks (a few days? An hour? A moment?), Ms. Johnson's fear of those who rely on violence and intimidation has simply dissipated. 

When the conversation turns to Dr. Tiller's murder in May 2009, Abby Johnson makes it clear that her belief is that Scott Roeder, the accused killer, had clear ties to the anti-choice community; the same community with which she is now intimately a part of:

Interviewer: Did Scott Roeder, the accused killer of Dr. Tiller, make any death threats?

Johson: I'm not sure about death threats.

Interviewer: He was active in the community, 

Johnson: He was active in the anti-choice community, active with Operation Rescue. He did make some covert threats which are some of the things that we receive. But it [the threats] doesn't seem menacing until something like that happens. And then you think, 'Oh maybe we do need to be a little more cautious, a little more worried. I think it really hits home for our families and you know. I remember the day we found out George [Dr. Tiller] had been murdered my husband was like, please don't leave the house. because it's very real. The risk is very real.'

...Now we've seen increasing numbers of clinic violence and vandalimsm and hate mail. We receive hate mail at the clinic all the time. Religious sort of mailings  that come to us - fire and brimestone - that comes to us all the time.

Does something feel absolutely wrong here? How is is that Ms. Johnson can now turn to those whom she's feared, been the target of just weeks prior and now stand side-by-side? And, according to Ms. Johnson, just days before her religious awakening, none of what 40 Days for Life or the Coalition for Life does makes any difference whatsoever. So, what exactly does she think she's doing? Is it religious fervor that has overtaken her causing her to take leave of her senses such that she is willing to either forget that these anti-choice advocates have harrassed her very own family and staff or to just simply not care?

Interviewer: We talked about 40 days for life earlier and the potest in front of the clinic and we should note they stay out their for 24 hrs day supposedly. and they have a new bulding basically right next door, down the street from you all (PP). How do you think that is going to affect you all? Now it's going to be easier for them to do thse sidewalk counseling, is what they have said. 

Johnson:  I think they think it's going to be fantastic. I dont think it's going to make any difference at all. I think that when peple come to PP they know they are coming to a trusted health care provider and then they have these people standing out there on sidewalk screaming at them.  Patients are confused thinking why are people screaming at me from the sidewalk? They just don't understand. They just want to come in, go to their appointment, get taken care of and leave. I think their belief is that they are going to talk to all these people who are pregnant and are "abortion minded" walk them over to their little house  (we call it the guilt house) and change their mind. We haven't seen it happen once. Um, our patients, generally are annoyed that someone is out there trying to change their mind on what they shourl or shouldnt' be doing - give them grief on their choices and now they are providing pregnancy tests ove there. They aren't a medical facility so they can't get medical grade pregnancy tests - so basically dollar store pregnancy tests. So, the majority of our business is not pregnancy tests so I'm not sure what kind of business they think they'd be taking from us. They've been down the road from us for ten years and our numbers continue to increase every years so I'm not sure what they think they're going to do. 

 

She clearly states that none of what Coalition for Life or 40 Days for Life does helps women in any shape or form. 

Ah, but the final dig, as the interview wraps, is reserved for Fox News. Yes, the very network on which Ms. Johnson will appear this Friday. The station on which Abby Johnson was interviewed was running a pledge drive when the interview was being conducted and so Ms. Johnson is asked why people should donate to KEOS. 

Johnson: People should donate. Because if you believe in getting accurate information and not information from FOX News, then you should donate...
Abby Johnson may have honestly experienced what feels to her like a thunderous religious conviction, rattling her to the bones. But from this interview, conducted possibly days before, there are far too many holes in this story to let it be. Clinic staff workers at this Planned Parenthood likely feel no more safe today, no more protected from the death threats, no less harrassed by those who Johnson herself claims do nothing to help the women of their community but with whom she has now aligned herself, though probably much more firm in their own conviction that providing health care services to women who need them is an honorable, noble and necessary cause.

Tags: , , ,
Current Mood: working

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Sorry for the delay people. My laptop was stolen last week and you don't want to know what I had to do to recover this file. Anyhow, my guest on Issues for Your Tissues last week was the wonderful Sarah Wheat, of Planned Parenthood of the Texas Capital Region.  We spoke about their Annual Speaker's dinner that was held Thursday, October 29th.  Their keynote speaker was Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State for President Bill Clinton.


Tags: , ,
Current Mood: stressed

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend

I Am Not A Pre-Existing Condition

Is the fact that women experience discrimination in regards to health insurance coverage even debatable at this point? It is critical that health reform discussions address the health issues that disproportionately affect women in this country. Whether we're discussing a public option [1] or more equitable private coverage, women's health must be front and center. The Service Employees International Union [2]has done extensive research, [3] promoted actions [4] and continues to raise awareness around these issues so special gratitude is due to SEIU for the facts and figures below.

Did you know?

  • Only 14 states require insurance companies to cover maternity care
  • Only 12% of individual insurance plans include comprehensive maternity coverage
  • Insurance companies can consider prior cesarean sections as a "pre-existing condition" [5] and deny a woman coverage for childbirth. Additionally, in Florida for example, women who have had c-sections are charged 25% more in premiums [6] if they want to retain their health insurance coverage of birth.
  • In Illinois, according to a Chicago Sun-Times article on 6/26/07, a woman's emergency c-section (much to her physician's consternation) was denied coverage by BlueCross BlueShield.
  • For that matter, pregnancy itself is often considered a "pre-existing condition" by insurance company, therefore a reason to deny coverage. According to a 2008 study [7]conducted by the National Women's Law Center, "The vast majority of individuals market health policies that NWLC found do not cover maternity care at all. Even if a woman is not currently pregnant, it is unlikely that an insurer will provide or even offer maternity benefits as part of her regular insurance policy."
  • Victim of domestic violence? As the SEIU flyer says, in eight states and Washington DC it is legal for insurance companies to deny health coverage [8] to victims of domestic violence. In fact, when the vote to ensure coverage for individuals in this situation came to the floor of the Senate in 2006 (through a proposed bill by Washington state Senator Patty Murray), ten Republicans voted against it, killing the bill.
  • In 2007, Senate Republicans voted to override regulations requiring insurance companies to cover mammograms in more than 20 states. The year prior, ten Republicans voted against requiring insurance companies to cover mammograms.


For the above reasons and so many more, advocates, bloggers, and activists have come together to create an awareness campaign, "I Am Not A Pre-Existing Condition" and demand stronger reform on these issues. What follows is a round-up of some of the posts written thus far. If you'd like to start off by joining the campaign, sign the petition [9] to ensure that health reform measures address gender discrimination and tweet away!

Tags: , , ,
Current Mood: hopeful

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend

Today on Issues for Your Tissues my guest was Michael.  He was representing for the fellas today and is a great example of a guy who understands that reproductive justice affects us all and that freedom's not just for men....and it costs a buck o five.

We had a great discussion on the healthcare debate covering hypocrisy, stagnation, the Hatch Amendment and more.



Tags: , ,
Current Mood: worried

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
On this week's Issues for Your Tissues, I discussed a new bill in Baltimore aimed at truth in labeling.  The Limited-Service Pregnancy Centers Disclaimer Bill would require crisis pregnancy centers to be honest about not offering comprehensive information on birth control or abortion.




Tags: , ,
Current Mood: tired

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
 Friends, I hope you will join me in supporting a great and worthy organization.   Access to our legal system is vital if all of us are to continue receiving due process and equal protection under the law.  I believe that using the judicial system as a barrier to exercising our rights must be met with uncompromising dedication to providing all those that seek access to the courts with competent and caring legal representation.


In 2001 the Anti-choice legislative majority passed a parental involvement law in the state of Texas.  Since that time Jane's Due Process has been on the front lines ensuring legal representation for pregnant minors in Texas.  Our goal is to have every pregnant teen know that she has the right to seek legal help, to be treated with respect and sensitivity by those who work in the legal system, and to participate in legal proceedings where everyone is interested in following the law.

Bingo is a game of chance but access to health care and our legal system shouldn't be.

The second annual Jane's Bingo Bash of Austin will be held at Mercury Hall, 615 Cardinal Lane on October 8, 2009 from 7:00pm to 10:00pm. 
Forget rubber chicken and endless speeches in hotel ballrooms!  Join Jane's Due Process supporters of all ages for a fantastic time. Featuring celebrity bingo callers and Austin's Roller Derby Girls.  Exciting prizes will be bestowed on those of you who win.  Cool libations from Tito's vodka and delicious food from El Sol y La Luna will be enjoyed by everyone, bingo winner or not.

Tickets only $25 and sponsorships and extra bingo cards available.

More information on Jane's Due Process at http://janesdueprocess.org/

Thanks,

Blake

Tags: , ,
Current Mood: busy

profile
Issues for Your Tissues 91.7 FM KOOP
Name: Issues for Your Tissues 91.7 FM KOOP
Website: KOOP Radio
Days
Back November 2009
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930
links
page summary
tags